Hitchcock for Halloween
October 8, 2012 Leave a comment
“A lot of people think I’m a monster, they really do,” Alfred Hitchcock once remarked, “It’s a complete misconception due to the fact that I deal in crime and that kind of thing. Whereas it’s just the opposite, I’m more scared than they are of things in real life.”
Having such a sinister reputation seemed to amuse the celebrated director of so many classic suspense and psychological thrillers, undoubtedly because Hitchcock thought of himself as a perfectly normal filmmaker whose mission in life was “to simply scare the hell out of people.”
With 53 feature films to his credit in a career spanning six decades, there’s no doubt that Hitchcock was the acknowledged master of the suspense genre, and his catalog of thrillers retains the power to both terrify and tantalize audiences to this day.
“The only way to get rid of my fears is to make films about them,” said Hitchcock, and film fans are intimately familiar with the horribly delicious sensations of fear and anxiety that his movies inspire.
Hitchcock well understood just how much his audiences loved to be scared, and was a genius at using every cinematic tool at his disposal — even pioneering several techniques of camera movement and film editing — to “always make the audience suffer as much as possible.”
For those fond of “putting their toe in the cold water of fear,” I suggest the following five classic films by the master; each guaranteed to deliver frightfully good entertainment, and more than a few thrills.
Rear Window (1955) – A wheelchair-bound photographer escapes the boredom of his convalescence by spying on his neighbors from his apartment window. When he witnesses mysterious activity in the apartment building across the way he becomes convinced that one of the tenants has committed a murder.
But how can he prove there actually was a crime if he did not see it happen? And what can he do when the suspect suddenly realizes that someone is watching him? And just what exactly is buried under the zinnias in the garden?
Everything from the photographer’s incapacitating broken leg to the restrictive design of the apartment courtyard set contributes to the viewers’ feelings of confinement and helplessness. Viewers identify with the hero, whom they are in essence spying on through their own “window” of the television screen.
“Sure he was a Peeping Tom,” said Hitchcock, “Aren’t we all?”
Vertigo (1958) – Three of Hitchcock’s favorite themes, deception, guilt and obsession, are beautifully melded in this dream-like psychological murder mystery.
An acrophobic private detective is tormented by the suicide of the woman he was being paid to follow, and with whom he had fallen hopelessly in love. When by chance the detective later sees another woman who resembles this lost love, he acts on his twisted desire to recreate his ideal woman, with tragic results.
Never does Hitchcock displayed more cunning and control than in Vertigo, where he uses disturbing images, vivid color cues, camera techniques and lighting to help convey deep human emotions and unbalance reality for his audience.
Psycho (1960) – More than 50 years after its release, “Psycho” is still as horrifying and mesmerizing as it was to audiences in 1960. Even repeated viewings cannot dull the terror of the infamous shower scene or the dark humor of the twist ending. A shrieking musical score by Bernard Hermann adds immeasurably to the many tense sequences.
Anthony Perkins is nothing less than brilliant as the boy whose best friend is his mother. In fact, the screen version of the character was written with Perkins in mind, and to a large extent the actor was forever afterward identified with Norman Bates.
Perkins eventually made peace with his most famous role, and in 1985 said, “Actually, it’s an honor to be associated with a movie that has lasted and gone on through a generation, and is still able to quicken the pulse. I think it’s great.”
“Hitchcock,” a 2012 film by Sacha Gervasi based on Stephen Rebello’s non-fiction book, centers on the relationship between director Alfred Hitchcock and his wife Alma Reville during the making of “Psycho.”
The Birds (1963) – On a whim, a spoiled socialite follows the handsome lawyer she meets in San Francisco to his bayside family home. There she is inexplicably attacked and injured by a seagull, an incident which turns out to be the precursor to a series of widespread and deadly bird attacks over the course of several days.
Crafting horror out of seemingly ordinary situations was Hitchcock’s specialty. “I have a phrase to myself,” said Hitchcock, “I always say that logic is dull.”
As there’s never any explanation as to why thousands of ordinary birds should suddenly run amok and start attacking and killing, it’s precisely that illogic and fear of the unknown that Hitchcock uses to fuel the terror in “The Birds.”
With almost an hour of character development before the first attack, viewers have plenty of time to get to know each character, making it easy to empathize with them as their sense of security (and ours) gets slowly eroded away by the mounting and incomprehensible threat.
Frenzy (1972) – Unless you are a diehard Hitchcock fan you may never even have heard of “Frenzy.” Back in 1972, the film’s gruesome subject was considered quite shocking, and even today the violent rape/strangulation sequence in the beginning is still genuinely disturbing.
Almost from the beginning we know who is behind a series of necktie strangulation killings in this grim “wrong man” thriller. “Will he get away with it?” is the question that keeps viewers glued to their seats.
Hitchcock’s next-to-last film serves up a very dark side of humanity with dollops of incredibly black humor, as showcased in the film’s nail-bitingly suspenseful scene of the killer frantically searching for an incriminating piece of evidence in the back of a potato truck.
“In ‘Frenzy’ you’ve got a cheerful, lively man who is a psychotic,” said Hitchcock. “Unless they’re pleasant and acceptable their victims would never go near them. Most people misunderstand what a villain is – he’s a charming man who kills women. If he didn’t have the charm, they’d run a mile from him.”